POST-VACCINATION SYMPTOMS AFTER A THIRD DOSE OF SARS-COV-2 MRNA VACCINATION IN PATIENTS WITH INFLAMMATORY BOWEL DISEASE

Background:Symptoms after SARS-CoV-2 primary vaccination among patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) are generally similar to the general population,although symptoms after the second dose are more frequent and severe than after the first dose.Postvaccination symptoms after a 3rd mRNA vaccine dose in the predominantly immune-compromised IBD population is unknown.Methods:Adults with IBD participating in the prospective Coronavirus Risk Associations and Longitudinal Evaluation in IBD (CORALE-IBD) vaccine registry who received a 3rd mRNA vaccine dose were asked to complete a detailed symptom survey 1 week after vaccination.Symptoms were assessed across 11 organ systems,and graded as mild,moderate,or severe,or requiring hospitalization.“Severe+” referred to those with severe symptoms or who required hospitalization.We stratified by age (<or> 50 years) given prior distinct symptom profiles after dose 2 (D2).We also evaluated whether severe+ symptoms after D2 predicted severe+ symptoms after dose 3 (D3).Results:We included 524 participants (70% female, mean age 45 years) who received a 3rd mRNA vaccine through October 11, 2021.Most had Crohn's disease (71%), and 89% were on biologic therapies.Most (58%) had received primary vaccination with BNT562b2,and only 3.5% reported prior COVID infection at the time of initial vaccination.Overall, 97% of subjects received a 3rd dose with the same mRNA vaccine as in their initial series with the remainder receiving the other mRNA vaccine type.No participants received a 3rd dose with the Ad26.CoV.2 (J&J) vaccine. Overall, 41% reported symptoms after a 3rd dose,with symptoms generally more frequent and severe among those <55 years (Table).The most frequent postvaccination symptom was injection site pain (39%).Common systemic symptoms included fatigue/malaise (34%),headache (23%),and muscle, bone or joint symptoms (13%).These were all less frequent after D3 than after D2 (Figure).Gastrointestinal symptoms were reported by 8.8%, which was slightly more frequent than after D2 (7.8%).Among those with postvaccination symptoms, the proportion with severe symptoms after D3 was lower than D2 for fatigue/ malaise, headache, dizziness and lightheadedness, fever/chills, and rheumatologic symptoms, but was slightly higher than D2 for gastrointestinal symptoms.Severe+ symptoms were seen in 17% after D2 and in 14% after D3. Of those with severe+ symptoms after D2, 34% had severe+ symptoms after D3.In contrast, about 22% had severe+ symptoms after D3 but did not report severe+ symptoms after D2.Conclusion:The frequency and severity of symptoms after a 3rd mRNA vaccine dose are generally similar or lower than those after a second dose.Furthermore, prior severe+ symptoms after D2 do not necessarily predict severe+ symptoms after D3. Further evaluation of postvaccination gastrointestinal symptoms in this population is warranted. (Figure Presented) (Table Presented)

Health-related quality of life, vaccine uptake and immune response among cancer patients undergoing treatment during the COVID-19 pandemic

Background: Cancer patients are at increased risk of severe COVID-19 illness because of their systemic immunosuppressive state. The potential effects of cancer and/or anticancer treatments on COVID-19 vaccine response, adverse events and progression are unknown. Moreover, the impacts of financial, familial and societal stressors during the pandemic on health-related quality of life are unclear. To address these concerns, we report data from the ongoing U.S. NCI-funded SeroNet COVID-19 Risk Associations and Longitudinal Evaluation Study (CORALE) at a large health care system in Los Angeles. Methods: Cancer patients are invited to complete questionnaires, donate blood specimens and engage in long-term follow-up with repeat questionnaires and biosampling. Patient-reported outcomes are assessed at baseline, post-vaccination, 6, 12 and 24 months. Clinical information on cancer type, stage, treatment, dates, medications and outcomes (adverse events, SARS-CoV-2 infection, COVID-19 vaccination and cancer-related outcomes) are extracted from electronic medical records. Results: From December 2019-May 2020, we enrolled 317 patients with malignancies or hematologic disorders (70.0% response rate). The median age was 63 (interquartile range (IQR)=54-73) years, 47% were women, 30% self-identified as non-White minorities and 18% were unable to work due to health status. 3% were known to been infected with SARS-CoV-2. An overall COVID-19 vaccine acceptance rate of 80% was reported. Among unvaccinated patients, women expressed more hesitancy than men (p=0.045). Concerns about adverse events (56%), rushed vaccine development (44%), and insufficient knowledge (44%) were reported. Self-reported symptoms after the first dose included injection site pain (21%) and fatigue (11%). We observed low levels of depression and high emotional support. Enrollment is ongoing. Conclusions: Individuals with cancer are a complex and extremely diverse population with a multitude of considerations for both immediate clinical care and long-term survivorship. Updated results including findings on antibody response to vaccination across cancer types/treatment protocols will be presented. Legal entity responsible for the study: Cedars-Sinai Medical Center. Funding: U.S. National Cancer Institute. Disclosure: All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

Phase II randomized study of ramucirumab plus pembrolizumab versus standard of care for advanced non-small cell lung cancer previously treated with a checkpoint inhibitor: Toxicity update (Lung-MAP non-matched sub-study S1800A)

Background: The therapeutic landscape in metastatic NSCLC has dramatically changed with approvals of immunotherapy agents in both treatment-naïve and previously treated cancer patients (pts) and irrespective of histology. Pts with tumors that develop resistance is a significant area of unmet need. Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) has been shown to modulate the tumor immune microenvironment and combination immune checkpoint and VEGF/VEGF receptor inhibition have shown benefit in multiple tumor types. Lung-MAP is a master protocol for pts with stage IV, previously treated NSCLC. Pts who were not eligible for a biomarker-matched substudy enrolled in S1800A. The adverse event profile will be presented. Methods: S1800A is a phase II randomized trial for pts who previously received PD-1 or PD-L1 inhibitor therapy for at least 84 days and platinum-based doublet therapy with ECOG 0-1 stratified by PD-L1 expression, histology and intent to receive ramucirumab in the standard of care (SOC) arm. Pts were randomized 1:1 to pembrolizumab and ramucirumab P+R or SOC (docetaxel +R [SOC w R];docetaxel, pemetrexed or gemcitabine [SOC wo R]). The primary endpoint was overall survival. Secondary endpoints included response, duration of response, investigator assessed-progression free survival and evaluation of toxicity. Results: From May 17, 2019 to November 16, 2020, 166 pts enrolled and 140 determined eligible [69 (49%) P+R;46 (33%) SOC w R;25 (18%) SOC wo R]. Treatments for those who received SOC wo R included 3 on docetaxel (19%);12 on gemcitabine (75%);and on 1 on pemetrexed (6%). 131 were eligible for adverse event (AE) assessment. The most common AE were fatigue (38%), proteinuria (28%), hypertension (23%), diarrhea (22%) and hypothyroidism (22%) on P+R;fatigue (61%), anemia (48%), diarrhea (41%) and neutropenia (39%) on SOC w R and anemia (56%), leukopenia (56%), fatigue (44%) and neutropenia (44%) on SOC wo R. Grade ≥ 3 treatment-related AEs occurred in 32% of pts on P+R, 54% of pts on SOC w R and 56% of pts on SOC wo R. Cardiac and thromboembolic events occurred in 12% of pts on P+R, 11% of pts on SOC w R and 0% of pts on SOC wo R. Grade 5 AE occurred in 2 pts on P+R (respiratory failure and cardiac arrest), 3 pts on SOC w R (2 respiratory failure and sepsis) and 1 pt on SOC wo R (sepsis). Four patients were diagnosed with COVID-19 (1 on P+R and 3 on SOC) and 3 died (1 on P+R and 2 on SOC). Conclusions: Grade 3 toxicities were lower in P+R compared to SOC arms with or without R. Cardiac and thromboembolic events were similar in arms that included R. P+R was generally well-tolerated. Efficacy outcomes will be presented when data matures.